AOSIS acknowledges that from a procedural angle, the revised World Stocktake textual content is an enchancment and does certainly mirror numerous submissions made by small island growing states. We welcome the inclusions to strengthen Nationally Decided Contributions (NDCs), the robust references to the science, and inclusions to make sure there are numerous assist parts to create a runway from this World Stocktake to the subsequent. Nevertheless, our world’s window to protecting 1.5 alive is quickly closing, and we really feel the textual content doesn’t present the required stability to strengthen world motion for course correction on local weather change.
AOSIS has been very clear that the World Stocktake have to be the automobile for supply in fact correction, but it sputters in vital areas.
When it comes to safeguarding 1.5C in a significant means –the language is most actually a step ahead, it speaks to transitioning away from fossil fuels in a means the method has not carried out earlier than. However we should notice the textual content doesn’t converse particularly to fossil gasoline phaseout and mitigation in a means that’s in truth “the step change that’s wanted”. It’s incremental and never transformational.
We see a litany of loopholes on this textual content which are a priority to us.
In paragraph 26 we don’t see any dedication and even an invite for Events to peak emissions by 2025. We confer with the science all through the textual content however then we chorus from an settlement to take the related motion with a view to act in step with what the science says we’ve got to do.
It’s not sufficient for us to reference the science after which make agreements that ignore what the science is telling us we have to do.
The paragraph on abatement” will be perceived in a means that underwrites additional growth. Phasing out of “inefficient” fossil gasoline subsidies is problematic, creating loopholes that weren’t there earlier than. We see step backward with inclusion of power poverty and simply transition as caveats. “Inefficient” is a matter for us. The inclusion of “transitional fuels” can also be fairly problematic.
In sub paragraph 28 (d) the unique concentrate on power techniques is disappointing. We’re involved that paragraphs 28 (e) and (h) particularly, doubtlessly take us backward moderately than ahead. In sub paragraph (e) we’re being requested to endorse applied sciences that might lead to actions that undermine our efforts. We have to see guardrails round this language.
AOSIS now appears to be like ahead to participating in a spirit of cooperation with our different Events to speed up motion on this crucial decade for our susceptible communities.
Donate At Caribbean Information Service, we don’t cost for our content material and we need to hold it that means. We’re in search of assist from people and organisations so we are able to
proceed our work & develop CNS additional.
