In a latest Don Anderson ballot, the vast majority of Jamaicans have expressed their choice for mounted dates for native authorities and parliamentary normal elections.
The survey, which passed off between November 24 and December 7, sheds gentle on the nation’s views concerning the timing of elections and marketing campaign finance transparency.
The decision for mounted election dates
In keeping with the survey, 73 per cent of respondents voiced their perception within the necessity of building mounted dates for elections.
Blended opinions on the Prime Minister’s position
Whereas a good portion of the inhabitants favors mounted dates, 13 per cent of respondents argued that the Prime Minister ought to retain the authority to find out election dates.
In the meantime, 14 per cent of these surveyed remained unsure about their stance on this subject.
Calls for for marketing campaign finance transparency
Other than considerations about election dates, Jamaicans are additionally calling for higher transparency in marketing campaign financing.
When requested about their views on disclosing marketing campaign donations, 44 per cent of the 1,015 respondents advocated for the disclosure of contributions exceeding $250,000.
They consider that such contributions must be made public and reported to the Electoral Fee of Jamaica (ECJ), guaranteeing accountability within the political course of.
Various views on disclosure
The survey revealed various opinions on the recipients of marketing campaign finance disclosure.
Whereas 15 per cent of respondents believed that disclosure ought to solely be made to the ECJ, 19 per cent held the view that it ought to stay confidential, neither disclosed to the ECJ nor the general public.
Moreover, 21 per cent of respondents both expressed indifference or stated they didn’t know to whom the disclosure must be made.
The ballot was carried out through the interval November 24 to December 7.
It has a margin of error of plus or minus three per cent.
