The Authorities of Guyana has strongly rejected a current assertion from China’s chargé d’affaires suggesting that Guyana and Venezuela can resolve their longstanding border controversy by “pleasant consultations and negotiations.”
In a press release issued on April 17, the Ministry of International Affairs and Worldwide Cooperation reiterated that the matter is already earlier than the Worldwide Courtroom of Justice (ICJ), following a call by the United Nations Secretary Common and in accordance with the 1966 Geneva Settlement between the events.
“The Ministry reminds the Authorities of the Individuals’s Republic of China of the place made pellucidly clear on a number of events by the Authorities of the Cooperative Republic of Guyana,” the assertion stated, affirming that Guyana is dedicated to the ICJ course of and won’t have interaction in parallel discussions that might undermine the Courtroom’s authority.
The ministry pointed to the Argyle Declaration of December 14, 2023, which acknowledges Guyana’s agency dedication to resolving the difficulty through the ICJ. “So as to not undermine the jurisdiction or authority of the Courtroom… Guyana is not going to have interaction in dialogue of any matter that has been introduced earlier than the Courtroom,” the ministry emphasised.
Guyana additionally expressed concern over China’s silence relating to Venezuela’s current provocative actions, particularly Caracas’ plan to carry elections on Might 25, 2025, for a governor and legislative council within the so-called “Guayana Esequiba State”—a reputation Venezuela has unilaterally assigned to Guyana’s Essequibo area.
– Commercial –
“The Ministry… has taken observe that there was no remark from the Authorities of the Individuals’s Republic of China” relating to this declaration, which Guyana deems a “clear violation” of its sovereignty and territorial integrity.
Because the diplomatic rigidity surrounding the century-old territorial dispute escalates, the Authorities of Guyana reaffirmed that ideas of worldwide legislation and mutual respect will stay the muse of its international coverage and interactions with the worldwide group.
The border controversy facilities on Venezuela’s declare to the Essequibo area, which includes about two-thirds of Guyana’s territory. The ICJ is at the moment contemplating the validity of the 1899 arbitral award that established the boundary between the 2 international locations.
